Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stub\s+QTHs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stub\s+QTHs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Stub QTHs (score: 1): Author: BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com (BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com); Date: Thu Mar 28 08:10:06 1996; it's good to start seeing more tech stuff again! OK....on my antennas I have CATV hardline coming in from the towers which stops just outside the shack and at that point it is married with something; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00153.html (15,906 bytes)
2. Stub QTHs (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Thu Mar 28 13:13:50 1996; that The best place to put a hi-reject stub is exactly a 1/4 wl from the source, if the source has a low pass filter in the output (like an ampolifier). The reason is a shorted stub is a low impedanc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00156.html (25,807 bytes)
3. Stub QTHs (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Thu Mar 28 19:37:10 1996; Oops, I made a boo boo! I said a shorted stub, and I meant to say an open stub! The criteria I gave was correct for a typical pi-type PA and THIRD harmonic stubs, with the exception of my calling it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00159.html (8,592 bytes)
4. Stub QTHs (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sun Mar 31 11:35:58 1996; Like anyone would be interested, but I reviewed the data again. Optimum attenuation occurs when cascaded stubs are place 1/4 wl apart (or odd multiples thereof) *at the REJECT frequency*. Optimum SWR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00175.html (30,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]