- 1. TRIBANDER STACKING - MORE FUN THAN "QRL ?" ! (score: 1)
- Author: ron@gw3ydx.demon.co.uk (Ron Stone)
- Date: Thu Jul 27 23:13:56 1995
- -- -- -- -- -- Hi there Chaps What shall I do about tribander stacking ? I've already decided that the Dunestar stack match is the way to go and Ron is appointing me as EU distributor for the product
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-07/msg00165.html (11,406 bytes)
- 2. TRIBANDER STACKING - MORE FUN THAN "QRL ?" ! (score: 1)
- Author: K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com)
- Date: Sat Jul 29 12:38:54 1995
- Hi Ron... I am facing the same dilemma myself for stacking a 150' tower.....And I have to make a decision in the next few weeks...I am also agonizing between the C3/4 and KT34XA... First, I think tha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-07/msg00168.html (25,774 bytes)
- 3. TRIBANDER STACKING - MORE FUN THAN "QRL ?" ! (score: 1)
- Author: ron@gw3ydx.demon.co.uk (Ron Stone)
- Date: Mon Jul 31 00:02:12 1995
- tower.....And I have between the the small, than the stack of they in a Due to need just in gain (undesireable)... multiplier off concern direction, such then more Here a KT34XA 6 element -- -- -- --
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-07/msg00177.html (21,939 bytes)
- 4. TRIBANDER STACKING - MORE FUN THAN "QRL ?" ! (score: 1)
- Author: K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Aug 2 10:00:24 1995
- Hi Ron... I strongly suspect that you are correct that for the next 2 or 3 contest seasons, that 20 - 160 is the area to concentrate onwith antenna improvements... A pair of 204BA's would work nicely
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-08/msg00011.html (7,357 bytes)
- 5. TRIBANDER STACKING - MORE FUN THAN "QRL ?" ! (score: 1)
- Author: K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Aug 2 14:47:27 1995
- Hi Scott... The antenna engineers estimate 0.5 dB for trap loss in the average tribander, which puts coil heating well below the melt down zone... I suspect their estimate to be in the ball park....
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-08/msg00016.html (8,035 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu