Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TVI\-RFI\s+re\s+K7SS\s+remote\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TVI\-RFI\s+re\s+K7SS\s+remote\s+question\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TVI-RFI re K7SS remote question (score: 1): Author: RKILE@delphi.com (RKILE@delphi.com); Date: Thu Sep 8 23:03:20 1994; What Danny didn't say..... Beyond the FCC not giving a shit. Precedence has already been established in King County Superior Court for his neighbor to file a nuisance and harassment suit and get an i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00050.html (7,491 bytes)
2. TVI-RFI re K7SS remote question (score: 1): Author: al511@Freenet.HSC.Colorado.EDU (Robert Neece); Date: Fri Sep 9 01:26:29 1994; If the basis for the nuisance lawsuit was TVI alone (and not some complex of factors, of which TVI was but a part), a precedent established in a state court would not, in the final analysis, be contr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00053.html (18,398 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]