- 1. Telrex v. DX Engineering (score: 1)
- Author: paulc@ccse.net (Paul Christensen)
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 15:09:13 -0500
- I have the opportunity to purchase two used antennas that are both young and in excellent physical condition. They're both full-size three-elements on 46-foot booms. The Telrex is a 40M346 and the ot
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00392.html (8,187 bytes)
- 2. Telrex v. DX Engineering (score: 1)
- Author: n4si@techinter.com (n4si)
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:17:44 +0000
- Obtaining parts from Telrex was a problem even when they were in business. Stay away from it. I like Phillystran a lot. It looks good, and has no RF issue at all. It costs about 20% more to guy a gi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00395.html (7,737 bytes)
- 3. Telrex v. DX Engineering (score: 1)
- Author: w6mr@pacbell.net (JOE CLEMENT)
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 15:40:02 -0800
- in the driven element insulator " it fails" and the driven element boom to element plate needs to be longer to add more support. After these two mods the antenna works well. I would like one myself.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00398.html (8,988 bytes)
- 4. Telrex v. DX Engineering (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 20:25:37 -0500
- Hi, Paul -- In 25 words or less, huh? You're covering lots of ground here but... The Telrex always got high marks for ruggedness and DXE antennas were not quite as robust. Locals KD7P and N7LTF have
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00400.html (9,148 bytes)
- 5. Telrex v. DX Engineering (score: 1)
- Author: k4sb@avana.net (k4sb@avana.net)
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 97 02:27:18 PST
- I bought a DX Engineering 3 el 40 last year....It's now used for aluminum parts, and I wouldn't have one now if it was given to me. The 40 is a piece of trash! On the other hand, I will pay shipping
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00404.html (7,308 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu