Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+negative\s+effects\s+of\s+packet\s+on\s+S\/O\s+Unass\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+negative\s+effects\s+of\s+packet\s+on\s+S\/O\s+Unass\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. The negative effects of packet on S/O Unass. (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sun Oct 27 09:13:50 1996; I had a chance to try out my wires this past weekend in the CQWW SSB contest. I decided to play around part time in the S/O unassisted category. It had been 8 years since I had tried this category an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00161.html (10,030 bytes)
2. The negative effects of packet on S/O Unass. (score: 1): Author: BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com (BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com); Date: Sun Oct 27 09:51:02 1996; This is what N6AA has been talking about...less operating ability demonstrated by the average operator (dumbing down?) and more usage of packet as a crutch as opposed to an aide...we have all read an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00163.html (7,504 bytes)
3. The negative effects of packet on S/O Unass. (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu Oct 31 07:54:58 1996; Isn't that the truth!?! What a colossal waste of time for HIM and ME. Pretty stupid operating IMO. BTW, this is why I sent a new Q signal request to the ARRL: QDC -- What's your damn call? 73, Steve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00216.html (17,985 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]