Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*To\s+dupe\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+dupe\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*To\s+dupe\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+dupe\.\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. To dupe or not to dupe.. (score: 1): Author: jmellis@ihug.co.nz (Martin Ellis); Date: Fri Nov 8 09:43:35 1996; Hi Tom, As an operator from the _DX_ side of a contest, I have to agree with you on this one. It is incredibly frustating to call a stateside contest station, and be told _sorry QSO before_, when tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00084.html (8,730 bytes)
2. To dupe or not to dupe.. (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Thu Nov 7 15:31:25 1996; Except in a contest with a long exchange, like SS, it's almost always faster just to work him again. You mark the dupe, claim zero points, and the log checkers will probably give you the contact/mult; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00085.html (10,421 bytes)
3. To dupe or not to dupe.. (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Thu Nov 7 17:13:07 1996; Chances of accidentally claiming credit for them is nil, but there are plenty of ways to get them in the log. So?? -- 73, Scott K9MA sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu Hi Gang! The deadline for the NCJ Cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00087.html (12,952 bytes)
4. To dupe or not to dupe.. (score: 1): Author: BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com (BK1ZX70SFL@aol.com); Date: Thu Nov 7 22:17:34 1996; the scenario for me typically is that I come back to N4ZA, give him my number and when he comes back to me I realise he is N4ZR...upon correcting the call he now is a dupe...big deal....the software; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00090.html (8,641 bytes)
5. To dupe or not to dupe.. (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri Nov 8 00:39:02 1996; Pete -- Actually, some of us SS hotshoes start with serial number 500 or thereabouts. It's a good psychological ploy and allows me to beat last years score handily. Plays hell with the competition to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00092.html (7,053 bytes)
6. To dupe or not to dupe.. (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Fri Nov 8 14:01:12 1996; Even in SS, is there a way to be absolutely sure the contact is a mutual dupe, that doesn't take longer than just completing the QSO? -- 73, Scott K9MA sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00105.html (6,689 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]