Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+160\s+meter\s+phased\s+inverted\-L\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+160\s+meter\s+phased\s+inverted\-L\'s\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: 160 meter phased inverted-L's (score: 1): Author: KenDulK8ZR@aol.com (KenDulK8ZR@aol.com); Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 09:11:52 -0500; I know that there are several hams on here using phased inverted-L's on 160 with 1/2 wavelength spacing. I remember reading some time ago that they have the ends of the L's pointed at each other. Is; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00276.html (7,092 bytes)
2. TopBand: 160 meter phased inverted-L's (score: 1): Author: n0dh@comtch.iea.com (Dave / N7EX); Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 09:28:09 -0800; The computer models indicate that if you are feeding the L's in phase (broadside) there is a slight advantage in having the L's point at each other. This is theoretically .5db to 1.5db over all the o; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00281.html (7,934 bytes)
3. TopBand: 160 meter phased inverted-L's (score: 1): Author: jon.zaimes@dol.net (Jon Zaimes AA1K); Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 02:32:47 -0500 (EST); Anyone using 1/2 wave spaced broadside Inverted L's on a hillside? I have the possibility of using a pair with one at bottom of hill, base elevation about 30-40 feet elevation, and second one at abou; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00302.html (8,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]