Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+ANC\-4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+ANC\-4\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: ANC-4 (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 11:31:22 -0700 (PDT); I had a few things to share about the ANC-4 I have been using. You might remember that I am using it to phase my transmit antenna (80 foot tower) and a second tower (95 feet) located 105 feet to the; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00350.html (7,917 bytes)
2. TopBand: ANC-4 (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:54:15 -0400 (EDT); Tree et al .. Re the ANC-4 I has a few messages from people saying they didnt have much success on 160 with them and since I was having the opposite experience I started playing ... First, the sense; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00351.html (7,596 bytes)
3. TopBand: ANC-4 (score: 1): Author: mystc@ix.netcom.com (mystc@ix.netcom.com); Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 20:04:00 -0700; I have had extremely good performance from the mfj unit (1025, 1026), like the anc4. The mfj has 2 advantages: 1.t/r adjustable delay 2.main antenna gain....when noise is too low to phase out with un; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00356.html (6,964 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]