Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Antenna\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Antenna (score: 1): Author: michon@eatel.net (Michael Michon); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 07:09:49 -0700; A friend and I are thinking of a vertical dipole for 160 meters. We have a fire tower 100 feet tall. 22 feet sqare at the base tapering to 6 foot square at the top. It is grounded. We would extend a; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00031.html (7,685 bytes)
2. TopBand: Antenna (score: 1): Author: michon@eatel.net (Michael Michon); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 19:24:14 -0700; Thanks for all the replys about the vertical dipole. Lots of conflicting ideas. I will read some more and try to digest all of this and see if we want to go for it. Thanks again to all who were kind; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00039.html (7,415 bytes)
3. TopBand: Antenna (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 20:00:36 EDT; On Tue, 16 Jun 1998 07:09:49 -0700 "Michael Michon" <michon@eatel.net> writes: have a fire tower 100 feet tall. 22 feet sqare at the base tapering to 6 foot square at the top. It is grounded. We woul; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00040.html (9,391 bytes)
4. TopBand: Antenna (score: 1): Author: michon@eatel.net (Mike Michon); Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 08:57:37 -0500; I have 2 trees 90 feet tall spaced 180 feet apart. It is time to put up an antenna for the low bands. Last year I used an off center fed zepp, about 220 feet long and fed 80 feet from one end up abou; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00111.html (7,679 bytes)
5. Topband: Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:39:08 -0500; OOPS, my bad! I looked at the EZ-Nec plot on my antennas, and the take-off angle is 22 degrees, not 26 as stated in mt previous post. Getting old is.... Well you know. 73, Mike, W5UC *If you voted fo; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00223.html (6,593 bytes)
6. Topband: Antenna (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:48:47 -0700 (PDT); I was wondering if my inverted L ground plane would be better off as a 50 foot vertical so I did some modeling. Using EZNEC I put in most all the radials I have on the roof sloping from about 16 feet; /archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00130.html (7,682 bytes)
7. Topband: Antenna (score: 1): Author: "k8mv%k8fc.com" <k8mv@k8fc.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 21:21:32 -0400; Need some help. Came home from Florida to find damage to most antenna systems here. Have been using 50 foot high inverted L's on 160 and 80. Want to see it shunt feeding tower will be better but no s; /archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00005.html (6,512 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 23:32:29 -0400; Marty: I had an inv L for Topband before I built a self-supporting tower and shunt-fed it. For a while I operated both and did A-B comparisons on the air. The tower was 5-10 dB better than the L on T; /archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00006.html (8,181 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Antenna (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 05:47:00 -0400; Marty, You really don't need software for the configuration you described. A cage feed of your grounded tower would give you the best bandwidth over a single shunt wire. Attach three four foot one in; /archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00007.html (9,127 bytes)
10. Topband: ANtenna (score: 1): Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:03:51 -0400; Mike: Given the stated constraints, I'd put traps on the ends of the 80 meter inverted vee and add more wire to make a 160 meter inverted vee. If you are short on space, fold the ends in towards the; /archives//html/Topband/2016-06/msg00108.html (6,517 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]