Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Best\s+Antenna\s+$160M$For\s+limited\s+space\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Best\s+Antenna\s+$160M$For\s+limited\s+space\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Best Antenna (160M)For limited space. (score: 1): Author: shorouk@kuwait.net (EKA); Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 23:41:35 +0300 (GMT); Hi all I have tried the butternut vertical both models and they seemed to have worked smothly on all bands except for 160 9K2MU was telling me about a wire antenna but that would take a lot of space.; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00445.html (7,238 bytes)
2. TopBand: Best Antenna (160M)For limited space. (score: 1): Author: shorouk@kuwait.net (EKA); Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 00:09:47 +0300 (GMT); Hi all I have tried the butternut vertical both models and they seemed to have worked smoothly on all bands except for 160 9K2MU was telling me about a wire antenna but that would take a lot of space; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00446.html (7,452 bytes)
3. TopBand: Best Antenna (160M)For limited space. (score: 1): Author: shorouk@kuwait.net (EKA); Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 00:08:46 +0300 (GMT); Hi all I have tried the butternut vertical both models and they seemed to have worked smothly on all bands except for 160 9K2MU was telling me about a wire antenna but that would take a lot of space.; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00447.html (7,474 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]