- 1. TopBand: CN2IB (score: 1)
- Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin)
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 14:17:33 -0500
- Fellow Topbanders: Has anyone heard the CN2IB group on 160? I have seen one spot 449 in VE1 land. I have had a couple of skeds at 0400 and 0700 zulu with no luck. I heard an operator QSY off 80 at 04
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00042.html (7,504 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: CN2IB (score: 1)
- Author: dj7aa-wil@t-online.de (Wil DJ7AA)
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 23:14:03 +0100
- George Guerin schrieb: CN2IB has been active a few times on 160m with a good signal, heard him at 04.00 also 05.00 and in our evenings. Best he was fair 579 here on my qth. So hope you get him in the
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00043.html (7,946 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: CN2IB (score: 1)
- Author: gillie@us.ibm.com (Bill Gillenwater)
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 10:14:41 -0500
- CN2IB was on 3504 (+/-) at 0445 and announced he was QRV 1824 at 0600z. He actually came up on 1824 around 0535z and was readable in eastern PA. 73 de Bill, K3SV -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00053.html (7,012 bytes)
- 4. TopBand: CN2IB (score: 1)
- Author: k8cx@infonline.net (Thomas Roscoe)
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 16:15:03 -0500
- I worked CN2IB at 0612Z on 1.824 Mhz, he was 459 in NE Ohio. He was hearing fairly well. 73...Tom...K8CX... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com A
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00060.html (7,145 bytes)
- 5. TopBand: CN2IB (score: 1)
- Author: vertex@execulink.com (BILL, VE3CSK)
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:14:09 -0500 (EST)
- I first heard him at about 0545, very weak and down at my noise level. By about 0605, he was 449 and I gave him a buzz, to which he replied imediately with a good report. Propagation must have been b
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00061.html (7,525 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu