Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Elevation\s+Angle\s+vs\.\s+Conductivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Elevation\s+Angle\s+vs\.\s+Conductivity\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Elevation Angle vs. Conductivity (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 22:17:49 -0800; I recently decided to compare antenna radiation at differing elevations with differing ground conductivities. I used EZNEC 2.0 software (obviously using real ground parameters [I'll let others tell o; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00289.html (7,705 bytes)
2. TopBand: Elevation Angle vs. Conductivity (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:08:28 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> Snip (chart showing improving efeciency with improving ground) EXACTLY! This is exactly what I have been trying to get across. Efficiency is efficiency. Power not lost to; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00296.html (7,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]