Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+HEARD\s+better\s+on\s+xmit\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+HEARD\s+better\s+on\s+xmit\s+antenna\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 23:32:47 -0500 (EST); This is an excellent hypothesis by Jon! The only problem with it I see is that most of the guys who are observing the "better on the transmit antenna" phenomenon are about 1500 miles away from VK0IR'; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00351.html (7,646 bytes)
2. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 09:40:57 -0500 (EST); << >Would "antipodal focusing" possibly explain I have found that my transmit antenna is frequently better, but it is not omnidirectional, and has 15dB of FB ratio, so antipodal focusing is unlikely.; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00355.html (7,503 bytes)
3. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 14:05:24 -0800 (PST); I think some of the odd signal strength behavior is due to multiple paths open at once, maybe close to each other in azimuth. Since the paths are so long, their signal strengths vary considerably, ov; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00366.html (7,330 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]