Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Hill\s+vs\.\s+Ocean\s+QTH\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Hill\s+vs\.\s+Ocean\s+QTH\s+$long$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Hill vs. Ocean QTH (long) (score: 1): Author: Ve3bmv@aol.com (Ve3bmv@aol.com); Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 14:09:54 -0500; Hill vs. Ocean QTH Those are the notes I have received after posting the Hill vs. Ocean QTH question, which is better? We know that on VHF the hill is the answer. For low bands, this is not as clear; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00206.html (18,173 bytes)
2. TopBand: Hill vs. Ocean QTH (long) (score: 1): Author: goforit@worldnet.att.net (Doug); Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 15:25:29 -0800; VE3BMV WROTE <<We know that on VHF the hill is the answer...>> Is this an assumption? I would take issue with it. It certainly contradicts my experience of 38 years. I have been a VHF and HF conteste; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00309.html (7,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]