Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Hill\s+vs\.\s+Ocean\s+QTH\s+\-\s+response\s+summary\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Hill\s+vs\.\s+Ocean\s+QTH\s+\-\s+response\s+summary\s+$long$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Hill vs. Ocean QTH - response summary (long) (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:44:50 -0500; Hill vs. Ocean QTH Those are the notes I have received after posting the Hill vs. Ocean QTH, which is better? We know that on VHF the hill is the answer. For low bands, this is not that clear and has; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00165.html (18,143 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]