Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+How\s+many\s+radials\s+is\s+enough\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+How\s+many\s+radials\s+is\s+enough\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: How many radials is enough? (score: 1): Author: kaufmann@ll.mit.edu (John Kaufmann); Date: Wed, 2 Oct 96 10:23:49 -0400; In view of all the discussion on verticals and radials, I thought it would be useful to reproduce some of the radial data reported in the Brown, Lewis, and Epstein paper which Tom W8JI has cited. For; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00026.html (10,199 bytes)
2. TopBand: How many radials is enough? (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 13:45:04 -0400; Thank's John, for the summery of the data in the L.B and E study. It was a bit of work putting it in that form, but that is more useful than verbal descriptions. My goal isn't to run NEC or elevated; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00027.html (9,188 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]