Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+question\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com); Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 03:04:10 -0400; HI John, Your comments are refreshing as they are accurate and clearly state the case that absolute statements are not always true no matter how many names are quoted. Keep up the inputs. Don't let t; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00004.html (7,481 bytes)
2. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 10:09:18 -0400; case Before we get carried away with little bits of funny humor let me explain why I'm a "doubting Tom". I reseach things before I get caught up in a "new frenzy". When the elvated radial thing came; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00008.html (9,409 bytes)
3. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: rbodine@computerpro.com (rbodine@computerpro.com); Date: Tue, 01 Oct 1996 12:56:07 -0500; SNIP... Snip... A point of interest! At my former location I had a 75' tower w/TH6 on top. I did poor planning of the installation by installing guys at three equidistant elevations and not insulatin; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00011.html (8,628 bytes)
4. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: robrk@fyi.net (Robert Morris); Date: Tue, 01 Oct 1996 14:02:45 -0700; In 26 words or less (save your time and BW), what were your results concerning elevated wires ? Thanks, Bob - K2RK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contestin; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00012.html (10,419 bytes)
5. Re[2]: TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin); Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 16:06:04 -0400; --IMA.Boundary.686002448 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part SNIP... Snip... A point of interest! At my former location I; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00014.html (8,545 bytes)
6. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 18:00:23 -0400; If only a few radials were used, elevating them helped a dB or two but they were still down 4-5 dB from 60 radials. If 60 radials were used, it made no difference if they were elevated or contacting; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00016.html (7,427 bytes)
7. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 19:27:30 -0400; It is important to remember that while a more extensive ground system helps, there is virtually no difference between 50- 60 radials and 100-120 radials IF the radials are only 1/4 wl long. At 3 MHz,; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00000.html (8,790 bytes)
8. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: muenzlerk@uthscsa.edu (Kevin Muenzler); Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 09:54:25 -0500; Gang, I've seen the inverted-L described a couple of times but haven't paid much attention. (sorry) Would someone please describe to me the inverted-L antenna. Thanks, Kevin, WB5RUE -- FAQ on WWW: ht; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00216.html (7,832 bytes)
9. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: w2crs@kktv.com (w2crs@kktv.com); Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:01:22 -0500; Kevin, Here's my understanding of the inverted L (and I hope others will help me understand it better by critiquing my conmments). The inverted L is a 1/4 wave (130' approximately) Marconi antenna fe; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00218.html (8,960 bytes)
10. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: n0dh@comtch.iea.com (Dave Henderson, (Nawvemburr Zeeero Dawg House)); Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 09:38:47 -0700; Kevin Simply put an inverted L is a vertical antenna in which some portion of the upper end of the vertical is bent over 90 degreees parrallel with the ground. They are most ofetn seen on 160 meters; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00219.html (9,478 bytes)
11. Re[2]: TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin); Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:58:31 -0400; --IMA.Boundary.340167348 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Simply put an inverted L is a vertical antenna in which some; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00220.html (12,037 bytes)
12. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: wb4iuy@ipass.net (Dave Hockaday); Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:50:13 -0400 (EDT); Hi Doug and the rest of the group. Would an inverted-L, installed with the top of the L section at 100 ft, offer any significant improvement in low angle radiation over an inverted V installed at 10; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00221.html (9,583 bytes)
13. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: n0dh@comtch.iea.com (Dave Henderson, (Nawvemburr Zeeero Dawg House)); Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:48:42 -0700; Dave Hockaday IMHO the inverted L would be a better DX antenna on 160 meters (most of the time). Put up both of them for a while and A/B switch them back and forth to convince your self. You know the; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00223.html (9,254 bytes)
14. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: dj8wl@uugate.wa7slg.ampr.org (dj8wl@uugate.wa7slg.ampr.org); Date: Thu, 26 Sep 96 16:40:51 mst; Hello Dave, hello Kevin, hello all, I have been using inverted L's here for many years. They are good performers as far as dx and "local" communication is concerned. The longer you make the horizonta; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00224.html (9,642 bytes)
15. Re[2]: TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin); Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 10:34:57 -0400; --IMA.Boundary.184538348 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Dave Henderson wrote: IMHO the inverted L would be a better; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00234.html (10,528 bytes)
16. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com); Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:22:14 -0400; HI Kevin, There is a great fascination with inverted L's on the East coast. As you know any antenna will work DX from there. I can tell you that from the West coast we must be more careful with where; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00235.html (9,666 bytes)
17. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 13:19:31 -0400; In the poor soil of Georgia, and the poor soil of New Jersey, a bunch of radials on the ground work best. A few radials (like 8 or less) in the air are better than a few radials on the ground, but ne; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00238.html (8,933 bytes)
18. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (K1ZM@aol.com); Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 20:01:30 -0400; Hi Tom I couldnt agree with you more. I use over 1000 radials (some over 300 feet long) under my 160m systems and the old adage "you don't get something for nothing" sure applies in the case of 160M; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00242.html (10,105 bytes)
19. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com); Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 00:07:01 -0400; HI Tom, Your knowledge has beed very beneficial to the topband antenna discussions. However, there are many factors to optimizing a 160m antenna. The first thing you have to do is decide what you wan; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00249.html (9,558 bytes)
20. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:21:27 -0400; Hi Jeff, A properly installed ground system does not affect high angle radiation. In order for the radials to greatly affect high angle radiation, they have to radiate. The only way a radial system w; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00266.html (12,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]