Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+KZ5MM\s+Noisy\s+Beverage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+KZ5MM\s+Noisy\s+Beverage\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 16:08:04 EST; Having read all messages which started with KZ5MM's noisy Beverage, it appears that the proximity (noise) problem (Beverage near Tx vertical) exists when the Tx vertical has elevated radials. Convers; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00074.html (8,320 bytes)
2. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:40:11 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> I can think of at least one good reason _NOT_ to run much of the beverage near a transmitting vertical which is over ground which has been improved with many adequately; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00075.html (9,951 bytes)
3. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: sander@aud.alcatel.com (dick sander); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 98 15:37:35 CST; Here's my personal experience about noise coupling and reradiation. I've drawn my antenna farm to show antenna proximity. I graphed the typical noise of each antenna as indicated on my S-meter. The p; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00076.html (11,155 bytes)
4. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: jzaimes@wilmingt.gannett.com (Zaimes, Jon); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:54:00 -0500; At a former QTH, I had a 113-ft shunt-fed tower, with a couple of yagis for top loading. I had over 200 slightly-buried radials, filling a rectangle approximately 270-ft by 140 ft, with the tower in; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00083.html (10,339 bytes)
5. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 00:09:53 EST; Like most others, I hope to learn on this Reflector by reading of others experiences. My assumption, based on the messages up to that point, was that elevated radials are nasty to Beverages and non-e; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00090.html (8,602 bytes)
6. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: john.devoldere@innet.be (John Devoldere (ON4UN)); Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 21:37:21 +0000; Hi Earl: The elevated radials are just one particular condition. I explained in my earlier mail that the vertical must be near resonance. That is the valid reason. My 160 m vertical uses only buried; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00095.html (10,336 bytes)
7. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: john.devoldere@innet.be (John Devoldere (ON4UN)); Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 07:14:48 +0000; What Jon describes confirms in detail what I stated in my earlier mail: it all depends whether or not the TX antenna remains RESIONANT during reception. So in most cases (depending on the feed system; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00098.html (13,185 bytes)
8. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU); Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:21:04 EST; My 5 cents on antenna interaction: be, for the lack of better term, an "aura" or envelope of antenna's function, that is close to it's radiation (or "RF suction" on RX) pattern. The resonance of the; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00108.html (11,402 bytes)
9. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: k7ox@pipeline.com (Gary D Elliott); Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 18:22:19 -0500 (EST); Earl K6SE might have hit the "Nail on the Head" At the recent N7KQ operation up in the White Mountains we used a Balloon Vertical. It's base was at 50 ft and the elevated radials 130 feet long ran of; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00114.html (8,348 bytes)
10. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 14:48:18 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Earl and others, The real key is in the coupling between the systems. If the conductors (antennas) have a high level of mutual coupling, they will affect each other in; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00117.html (10,215 bytes)
11. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 1): Author: kaufmann@ll.mit.edu (John Kaufmann); Date: Fri, 6 Mar 98 22:25:18 -0500; Let me add some more fuel to this fire and simply report that I had an experience similar to Tom's with my first Beverage installation which passed within 50 feet of my phased verticals. The Beverage; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00120.html (9,430 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]