- 1. TopBand: Low angle versus high angle (score: 1)
- Author: sire@omen.com.au (Steve Ireland)
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 06:56:04 +0800
- Those who have found that putting a vertical/low angle antenna on 160m improves their DX performance and think that this is the answer to everything/everybody should take heed from old campaigners li
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00379.html (9,107 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Low angle versus high angle (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 19:32:19 EST
- And I cant even get into the 3rd tier with my 160' high inverted V Steve. I think Yuri is correct...it is too high. When I first moved here in 89-90 winter all I had was a V at 55'...worked 3Y5X on B
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00385.html (11,344 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu