Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Radial\s+current\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Radial\s+current\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Radial current (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Larry Tyree); Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 11:17:00 -0700 (PDT); Gee - I had been feeling pretty good about my antenna system... That was - until W0UN sent me a copy of a recent article he saw. It seems likely that my 20 elevated radials aren't all equally sharing; /archives//html/Topband/1997-06/msg00010.html (9,387 bytes)
2. TopBand: Radial current (score: 1): Author: sears@rell.com (sears@rell.com); Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 14:05:05 -0500; Larry, I believe the article was written by my friend Dick Weber who is also the designer of my Rotating Tower and many others. He has been working on radial current distribution for quite some time.; /archives//html/Topband/1997-06/msg00011.html (10,799 bytes)
3. TopBand: Radial current (score: 1): Author: ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble); Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:12:16 -0700; -- To: <topband@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-topba; /archives//html/Topband/1997-06/msg00012.html (10,813 bytes)
4. TopBand: Radial current (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 23:25:37 +0000; I have some questions and comments, naturally. ;-) How on earth (no pun intended) do you get a "radial near zero impedance"? There is no such thing unless it is lossless. If the radial is lossless, t; /archives//html/Topband/1997-06/msg00014.html (12,695 bytes)
5. TopBand: Radial current (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver); Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 07:40:55 -0700 (PDT); Tom - Good points about the loss factors, but can you extend the model to include impedance effects due to resonance? I'm interested, not challenging the argument. For example, assume ground is reaso; /archives//html/Topband/1997-06/msg00015.html (7,691 bytes)
6. TopBand: Radial current (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 14:03:11 +0000; Hi Ward, If I understand correctly, you wonder what would happen if earth effects were uniform, and the current unbalance was due to length or placement of the radials. Let's look at the case of two; /archives//html/Topband/1997-06/msg00016.html (8,721 bytes)
7. TopBand: Radial current (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 11:31:18 -0700 (PDT); OK, I understand the closely-coupled case. Thanks! What about radials that have weak coupling to each other over uniform ground? Sounds like it wouldn't have much effect on loss. My modelling indicat; /archives//html/Topband/1997-06/msg00018.html (7,792 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]