- 1. TopBand: Re: [TowerTalk] Stealth Wire Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: km3g@cts.com (Lane C. Zeitler)
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 21:27:53 -0800
- Gentlemen, Concerning the Top Band antenna. Thanks to all who responded. Due to this being an issue of safety I have decided to do some more research and hold off on the original idea. Running the wi
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00246.html (11,250 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Re: [TowerTalk] Stealth Wire Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:07:31 -0500 (EST)
- Comment about antenna wires lighting fires in trees is, of course, valid. I totally burned up (left ashes only) the fiberglass end inulators on my 160 traped dipole a couple of years ago. Found the c
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00262.html (7,317 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: Re: [TowerTalk] Stealth Wire Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:37:56 -0500 (EST)
- << Comment about antenna wires lighting fires in trees is, of course, valid. I totally burned up (left ashes only) the fiberglass end inulators on my 160 traped dipole a couple of years ago. Found th
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00263.html (7,629 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu