Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+AM\s+Broadcast\s+Interference\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+AM\s+Broadcast\s+Interference\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: AM Broadcast Interference (score: 1): Author: davekennedy@juno.com (David Kennedy); Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 10:54:06 EST; To Ed--W0SD You are experiencing a type of Top Band QRM which has baffled me for years and I have yet to hear a reasonable explanation. I don't believe that these "sigs", which are spaced every 10 Kh; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00043.html (8,795 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: AM Broadcast Interference (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 17:06:49 -0500; Hi Dave, We can be sure these signals are mixing products. The only thing we can not be sure of is where they mix. I think a simple answer is out of the question. I have personally observed mixing pr; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00053.html (9,320 bytes)
3. TopBand: Re: AM Broadcast Interference (score: 1): Author: davekennedy@juno.com (David Kennedy); Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 19:55:00 EST; Thanks to several who commented on my message to Ed--K0SD re B.C. sigs every 10 Khz across the 160M band. Among other things my message said "don't waste your time and effort building low pass or ban; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00056.html (7,324 bytes)
4. TopBand: Re: AM Broadcast Interference (score: 1): Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 12:10:57 -0500; --IMA.Boundary.585917948 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Hi Gang, I reviewed my printouts of the BC interference topi; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00062.html (9,175 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]