Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+EWE\s+dialogue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+EWE\s+dialogue\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: EWE dialogue (score: 1): Author: gregsmith@futuredbn.co.za (Greg, ZS5K); Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:04:09 +0200; I agree with all Bill's comments on the EWE, including the above. I find that the width of the front lobe can be reduced significantly when using two EWE's phased, spaced about 40m apart. This clear; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00172.html (7,107 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: EWE dialogue (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 11:59:28 -0500; There is no free lunch with directivity. In order to have a narrow pattern, you need physical space in the array. You can get a big improvement if you have noise mostly arriving from one fixed direct; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00174.html (7,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]