Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Fwd\:\s+160\s+M\s+DX\s+window\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Fwd\:\s+160\s+M\s+DX\s+window\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: Fwd: 160 M DX window (score: 1): Author: aa8u@voyager.net (Bruce (AA8U)); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:02:05 -0500 (EST); To: <topband@contesting.com> == It is obvious to me from the above remarks that "this crowd" will continue to abuse the "DX window" just as they have in the past. It is also clear to me they feel the; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00076.html (8,895 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: Fwd: 160 M DX window (score: 1): Author: dave@mathworks.com (Dave Pascoe); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:34:17 -0500 (EST); Bruce (and others)- It's generally considered impolite and an invasion of privacy to post private email on a mail reflector or anywhere else on the Internet. I'm actually shocked that you did this. A; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00077.html (8,544 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]