Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Measuring\s+impedances\s+through\s+a\s+filter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Measuring\s+impedances\s+through\s+a\s+filter\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: Measuring impedances through a filter (score: 1): Author: pnesbit@melbpc.org.au (P & V Nesbit); Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 22:00:28 +1000; At 09:42 23/06/1998 +0000, Tom W8JI wrote (re using a filter ahead of an impedance analyzer): Quite true, however this problem is easily resolved. Assuming the filter is home brew, feed the component; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00073.html (8,251 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: Measuring impedances through a filter (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 21:33:19 +0000; Pete et all The above approach will work (all though I'm not sure I'd call it quick) as long as you "believe" you are dealing with a purely resistive load. If you assume that the impeadnce being meas; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00077.html (9,330 bytes)
3. TopBand: Re: Measuring impedances through a filter (score: 1): Author: pnesbit@melbpc.org.au (P & V Nesbit); Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 20:13:48 +1000; This is just what I proposed. I never suggested physical substitution, because that is what programs like Radio Designer are supposed to free us from! Perhaps I didn't make this point clear enough. T; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00081.html (8,347 bytes)
4. TopBand: Re: Measuring impedances through a filter (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:41:11 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Peter, Maybe not, it depends on the filters loss, numb4er of sections, slope of the filter, and component tolerences. I don't want to "go there" on the topband reflect; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00082.html (8,661 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]