- 1. TopBand: Re: Rohn Tower on 160m (score: 1)
- Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 04:15:56 EDT
- On Tue, 12 Aug 1997 12:38:35 -0500 philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements) writes: resonate the == Hi, Phil, I couldn't resist using a NEC-based program (ELNEC) on this one. Rohn 25 is 12.5" on a side.
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00059.html (9,857 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Re: Rohn Tower on 160m (score: 1)
- Author: jharper@bs2000.com (Jack Harper)
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 11:59:34 -0600
- <snip> <snip> <snip> <snip> Earl -- I found your analysis quite interesting. Am curious about several points: * What is the ELNEC program? Availability? * Also -- I have a HyGain HyTower vertical tha
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00061.html (10,402 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: Re: Rohn Tower on 160m (score: 1)
- Author: jhenders@tdrss.wsc.nasa.gov (Jim Henderson)
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 08:07:26 -0600
- Phil, Earl, and reflectees: An additional thought: I used the Rohn 3-foot top bearing shelf, a pair of non-Rohn thrust bearings, a 18-aluminum 2" mast,and a ground strap (on 80m). I mounted the 2 bea
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00065.html (8,906 bytes)
- 4. TopBand: Re: Rohn Tower on 160m (score: 1)
- Author: gtaft@voyager.net (gtaft)
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 23:00:06 -0700
- Most Rohn 25 top sections are only 8 feet tall. I'm in the process of putting up a full size 160 vertical of Rohn 25 and will use 12 ten foot sections of Rohn 25 and a "flat top" top section of 8 fee
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00069.html (7,560 bytes)
- 5. TopBand: Re: Rohn Tower on 160m (score: 1)
- Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 13:38:53 EDT
- I READ YOUR INFO RE THE ROHN 25 TOWER SPECS FOR 160M >VERTICAL. I WASN'T SURE THAT A 12.5" DIAMETER IS THE PROPER >EFFECTIVE DIAMETER FOR THE ROHN 25. I THOUGHT MOST PEOPLE >USED 8" FOR MODELLING PUR
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00085.html (8,803 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu