- 1. TopBand: Re: TopBand- "Local" Yackers (score: 1)
- Author: jim_jorgensen@qmgate.anl.gov (Jim Jorgensen)
- Date: 15 Nov 1996 11:59:13 U
- Reply to: RE>TopBand: "Local" Yackers Your reply misses the point, Mark. 1850 +/- 1 or 2 is clearly not available for general SSB DXing. As topband DX activity (both CW and SSB) increases worldwide,
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00203.html (9,460 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Re: TopBand- "Local" Yackers (score: 1)
- Author: n4rj@akorn.net (Hugh Valentine)
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 08:53:29 -0800
- To: <topband@contesting.com> Pardon me if I am being overly critical or if I have missed the point but I don't see anything humerous in saying "some dead guy's call" about a deceased amateur's prize
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00235.html (10,755 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: Re: TopBand- "Local" Yackers (score: 1)
- Author: jherman@hawaii.edu (Jeffrey Herman)
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 08:23:57 -1000
- This epitomizes my feelings against the vanity callsign program. Some young squirt who gets his license from memorizing the exam questions and passing a "fill in the blanks" code test then wants to
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00241.html (7,444 bytes)
- 4. TopBand: Re: TopBand- "Local" Yackers (score: 1)
- Author: nx1g@top.monad.net (Craig Clark)
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 21:50:15 -0600
- Sorry Jeff, yet again, you are off base. If the world were left to guys like you, we would still be using AM and spark. First of all, I will concede to you that Mark's comment is out of line. However
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00258.html (9,237 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu