Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Remote\s+signal\s+source\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Remote\s+signal\s+source\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Remote signal source (score: 1): Author: n9dx@michiana.org (Larry Higgins); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 11:27:14 -0500; Carl, I don't know whether 1.5 wavelengths is far enough to be out of the near field or not. Probably someone else here on the reflector can answer that. I think that if your oscillator at your anten; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00370.html (7,780 bytes)
2. TopBand: Remote signal source (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 16:49:25 EST; On Sat, 21 Mar 1998 11:27:14 -0500 Larry Higgins <n9dx@michiana.org> writes: Larry; But have not the assembled experts said that a dB at any angle is the same at any other when measuring the FS? If t; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00376.html (8,078 bytes)
3. TopBand: Remote signal source (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 12:24:26 EST; Eric and others... It appears that I will have several points of reference for the tests. A few may alternate between RX and TX as a further test of performance. At the QRP level would not a Beverage; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00427.html (8,873 bytes)
4. TopBand: Remote signal source (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 13:23:14 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> performance. If aimed directly at the antenna under test, it should be OK. Yes. If it is aligned exactly with the antenna under test, it will be coupled in the vertical; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00434.html (10,004 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]