- 1. TopBand: Some VSWR tests (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 21:03:49 EST
- It seems that I stirred up a hornets nest with comments about VSWR the other day. After reading some of the excellent responses and rereading my own message I see where I wasnt very clear to start wi
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00290.html (9,885 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Some VSWR tests (score: 1)
- Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 22:35:43 -0500 (EST)
- This is not intended to inflame anyone, but a look through Walt Maxwell's Relections or other transmission line textbooks might be helpful. This is really too much to explain on a reflector. Bill (wh
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00291.html (7,788 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: Some VSWR tests (score: 1)
- Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver)
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 20:52:23 -0800 (PST)
- Tom's concern about the components in the tank circuit is entirely well-founded. The peak currents and voltages are related to those at the input and output in some proportion to the Q of the matchin
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00293.html (7,740 bytes)
- 4. TopBand: Some VSWR tests (score: 1)
- Author: mtope@iu.net (W4EF)
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 05:19:59 -0000
- Carl, et al: Bill's results imply that perhaps his VSWR measuring device wasn't working properly. If the meter was correct, then the 1.1:1 measurement would imply a load impedance very close to 50 oh
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00294.html (11,854 bytes)
- 5. TopBand: Some VSWR tests (score: 1)
- Author: dfi@cyberhighway.net (Scott Cowling)
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 01:44:21 -0700
- reflector. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't want to inflame anyone either, but I respectfully disagree! This discussion (after the flame wars subsided) is most refreshing aft
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00296.html (7,740 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu