Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+ZK1XXP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+ZK1XXP\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: jhenders@zianet.com (Jim Henderson); Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 12:56:00 +0000; He showed up late (too late for east coast again) on 1822 with a weak signal. Had several takers from TX theu CA listening up only 1 khz. A cluster spot quoted him saying on 3795 he lost amp, maybe n; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00235.html (7,652 bytes)
2. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: sears@rell.com (sears@rell.com); Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 10:03:43 -0500; Jim, he showed up too late for North Texas also. He moved from 80m at 1202Z, showed up on 1.822Mhz at 1203Z which was right at our sunrise. His signal was weak to start and started to go down from th; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00238.html (8,475 bytes)
3. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: w5un@wt.net (David Blaschke); Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 16:28:03 +0000; I worked ZK1XXP (I'm in Manvel, south of Houston) at 1225Z, on 1.822 mhz. This was shortly after my sunrise. They were answering calls up 2 to 3 khz. I was surprised that their signal strength was be; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00241.html (7,667 bytes)
4. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin); Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 11:44:09 -0400; --IMA.Boundary.360040578 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part On 22 Sept. 97 they went from 40 to 160 at 1200 zulu and sta; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00242.html (8,923 bytes)
5. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: va3dx@sympatico.ca (GLENN WYANT); Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 12:03:46 -0700; Called desperately for 45 minutes, then exactly at my sunrise (1101 gmt) they answered me for # 194 !! WHEW!! Now for the KH7K!!!! - -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions:; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00248.html (7,244 bytes)
6. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: jend@midway.uchicago.edu (Gerard Jendraszkiewicz); Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 08:27:10 -0500; Worked the ZK1 this morning at 0943Z at 1.822/1.826 they were an honest 599. Listened to them until leaving for work at 1015Z. The were working all callers in rapid fashion, great signal and great op; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00249.html (7,641 bytes)
7. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: wb4iuy@ipass.net (Dave Hockaday); Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 11:21:12 -0400 (EDT); Samething here...I called a lot, took a break for breakfast with my wife, then called again at sunrise and hooked'm on the 2nd call...with my inverted V in NC! Dave WB4IUY - -- FAQ on WWW: http://www; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00253.html (7,544 bytes)
8. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: grhosler@imation.com (Gary R. Hosler); Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 10:39:04 -0500; T'was a different story here in the black hole. I went into the shack at 10:00Z and they were good copy (S4) with a nice pile up. GREAT operator, always confirming the call of the station they worked; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00256.html (8,799 bytes)
9. Sv: TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: otterstad@inet.uni-c.dk (ro); Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 17:35:23 +0200; Ragnar Otterstad email : otterstad@inet.uni-c.dk All these happy messages really make me envious !!! hi Nil here on any band below 30 meters 73 Rag OZ8RO-- - -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00259.html (7,399 bytes)
10. TopBand: ZK1XXP (score: 1): Author: PEMS_ST_DK@noeca.ohio.gov (PEMS_ST_DK@noeca.ohio.gov); Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 07:47:13 -0500 (EST); After the glowing reports of yesterday I got my behind up early (with help from Java the wondermutt) and fired up the rig which had been tuned on 160 the night before. At first I didn't hear the ZK1; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00278.html (7,811 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]