Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+an\s+elevating\s+experiment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+an\s+elevating\s+experiment\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: an elevating experiment (score: 1): Author: dj2ya@t-online.de (dj2ya@t-online.de); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 19:44:05 +0100; Hello friends and foes of elevation, Belonging to the silent majority of those who have followed the discussion on elevated vs. grounded radials with great interest I don't feel really satisfied as t; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00191.html (9,317 bytes)
2. TopBand: an elevating experiment (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 22:18:55 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Uli, The "S" meter is a good idea, since you could easily use a precision attenuator pad to calibrate the meter. That would actually be MUCH more accurate than a field; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00198.html (11,660 bytes)
3. TopBand: an elevating experiment (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQ K8DO); Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 13:34:01 EST; << With less than 16 radials, the elevated system showed a few dB advantage, less advantage as the number of radials was increased. At 64 radials it made no difference at all if the radials were elev; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00208.html (7,598 bytes)
4. TopBand: an elevating experiment (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 08:25:14 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Denny, As Eric pointed out, and I keep pointing out, changing the radials does NOT affect wave angle. It's part of Hamlore and common but incorrect rumor that they do.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00214.html (8,929 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]