Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+angle\s+vs\s+polarity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+angle\s+vs\s+polarity\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: angle vs polarity (score: 1): Author: k9la@gte.net (Carl K9LA); Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 21:55:25 -0700; <It is only at sunrise I find the dipoles useful, approaching or even beating a vertical. The question is WHY are they better. Is it polarity or wave angle? I suspect wave angle and probably not pola; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00045.html (8,380 bytes)
2. TopBand: angle vs polarity (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 07:03:02 -0400 (EDT); Very true! In fact, noticing signals on my Beverage system that were skewed by 90 degrees was usually a clue to check my dipole! When this happened, the dipole would often (but not always) be the bes; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00049.html (7,555 bytes)
3. TopBand: angle vs polarity (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 08:31:44 -0400; Hi Carl, <It is only at sunrise I find the dipoles useful, approaching or even That's true Carl, but I'm more interested in what I can observe with the limited antennas I have. Like everyone else, I; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00060.html (10,411 bytes)
4. TopBand: angle vs polarity (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 15:31:56 -0400 (EDT); I think 90 degrees may be best under certain conditions. If you are familiar with the Pederson ray propagation mode, I think that best describes what may be going on. Imagine the following: --/-- / F; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00063.html (9,614 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]