Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+ground\s+losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+ground\s+losses\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: jhenders@tdrss.wsc.nasa.gov (Jim Henderson); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 09:22:26 -0600; Esteemed Reflectees: Reducing losses in the ground system or counterpoise under a vertical is one important consideration, and one most of us can address. Reducing the power-robbing effects on low-an; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00079.html (8,419 bytes)
2. TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 17:30:13 +0100; Following on from Jim's point, how far out from the base of the vertical do you need to go with a method of reducing ground losses? Intuition suggests there would be advantages of getting out into th; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00080.html (7,571 bytes)
3. TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: sears@rell.com (sears@rell.com); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 11:57:41 -0500; A ground mounted 1/4wave vertical with the highly conductive Gumbo soil of North Texas really helps the far field pattern. Peter W5PS Following on from Jim's point, how far out from the base of the v; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00081.html (8,154 bytes)
4. Fwd: TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:58:01 -0400 (EDT); to list -- Forwarded message: Subj: Re: TopBand: ground losses To: <topband@contesting.com> Date: 97-08-14 13:01:56 EDT From: W2pm To: jhenders@tdrss.wsc.nasa.gov << Considering the current thread of; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00084.html (7,956 bytes)
5. TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 22:23:03 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> To: <topband@contesting.com> Several wavelengths with many hundreds of radials if you are worried about low angle radiation. If you don't do that, a 1/4 wave out will ge; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00091.html (9,066 bytes)
6. TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 02:18:03 EDT; == I don't know about the soil conductivity in North Texas, but when I lived in the Gulf coast area near Houston, I knew that the soil conductivity there was extremely good. My shunt-fed tower there; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00093.html (8,617 bytes)
7. TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 18:59:39 -0400 (EDT); One of the simplest and most effective things to do hasnt been mentioned much with everyone talking about standard Marconi type verticals ... I have found that getting the current node UP IN THE AIR; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00106.html (7,499 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]