Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+new\s+Inv\-L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+new\s+Inv\-L\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: new Inv-L (score: 1): Author: k8sm@juno.com (SCOTT A LONG); Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 21:15:46 EDT; I am looking for those who are using Inv-L's that have vertical sections that are only 40-50 ft high. Maybe you can tell me how it performs for you. I am putting up a new one after mother nature deci; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00073.html (6,913 bytes)
2. TopBand: new Inv-L (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 04:13:11 +0000; Scott I am currently using a 55' high Inv L on 160 it performs "adequately" but not as good as the 90' one I had at my previuos QTH. I have run Inverted L's as low as 35' on 160 with average results.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00080.html (7,534 bytes)
3. TopBand: new Inv-L (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 18:20:00 -0400; Hi Scott, When I consider the present signal of WD4JRA (who's L may be a bit taller than that), or the past signal of K8KAS, K8GIJ and WB8QMC (both on city lots with very limited height) they obvious; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00081.html (7,045 bytes)
4. TopBand: new Inv-L (score: 1): Author: wd4jra@planttel.net (John Vickers); Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:04:15 -0400; sections Hi Scott es all Don't sell the short Inv-L "short" !! The ant can give very good results. Mine is normally 68 ft vert and top section of 94 ft runs up, down ,and thru several large trees. B; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00083.html (7,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]