Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"T\"\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"T\"\s+Antenna\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: "T" Antenna (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:35:21 -0500; Good Day All, Question: if this is so when the two halves of the "T" are opposed 180-degrees (as in the "classic" design), what might I expect in terms of horizontal cancellation were I to place my t; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00192.html (7,228 bytes)
2. Topband: "T" Antenna (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:11:33 +0000; my two halves 90-degrees relative to one another...? I modeled it with 4NEC2 and it looks like the radiation at 90 degrees straight up is about -10 degrees compared to the main lobe. If the top wire; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00193.html (7,191 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: "T" Antenna (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:23:27 +0000; Murphy strikes again. What I meant to say was "the radiation at 90 degrees straight up is down about 10 DB compared to the main lobe." not 10 DEGREES. Sorry. 73, good luck in the contest, Rick K2XT; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00195.html (7,205 bytes)
4. Topband: "T" Antenna (score: 1): Author: RK <midnight18@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:04:19 +0000; Hi Guys, I was away at work the last few days with no internet. Thanks, Rick for filling the gap! Rick's point about the horizontal component is correct. A slightly higher radiation resistance but no; /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00070.html (7,883 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]