Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\(2wire\)\s+Beverage\s+transformers\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 13:59:03 +0100
Hi All and HNY for 2021. Preparing for the CQ160m with new (2 coax) 2-wire beverages to cover the missing azimuthal gaps based on LBDX. The first 2x Bevs worked great back in last Jan. Now I have dif
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00028.html (7,897 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 19:36:38 +0000
Hello Csaba, I approach this problem this way your impedance ratio is 745/50 ohms or 14.9 . To get turns ratio use the square root of that which is 3.86 . So round that up to 4 as a good turns ratio.
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00029.html (10,212 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 13:43:37 -0600
Lee, What kind of wire do you use that allows that many turns (4t and 16t)? 73 Mike W0BTU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00030.html (10,407 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:21:36 +0000
Hi Mike, Assuming that you did not miss that this was a tapped winding and not separate windings as Csaba mentioned. I see on reflection that he measured 1:1.16 on one of his tests. In reality it won
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00031.html (11,931 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 15:00:59 -0600
Ah! Very helpful, thanks! 73 Mike W0BTU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00032.html (10,885 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 16:09:37 -0500
Hi Lee, Csaba said his transformer was " n1=3T/n2=12T tapped @6T ". This sure sounds like a transformer with two separate windings (3 Turns on the Primary, and 12 Turns on the Secondary and then it a
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00033.html (14,525 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 16:53:48 -0500
Hi Lee, Csaba also refers to this transformer as T2 and based on what he has said so far I suspect he is constructing something similar to the two direction beverage shown in figure 7-115 in the 5th
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00034.html (15,450 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 22:15:38 +0000
Hi Don, Regardless of the transformer whether its a tapped or separate. I gave him the tools that should make whatever he does correct. Personally I keep my Beverage when I make one at 450 ohms which
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00035.html (15,808 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 00:06:40 +0000
Sorry Guys, I miss interpreted Csabas transformer problem. My email program truncated the URLs and most of the information past that point. What I did get I misread as a result so now I am curious al
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00036.html (18,846 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: "List Mail" <mail10@barefoothorse.com.au>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 11:39:50 +1100
"The best I could reach now on 160m is - SWR: 1:1.29 (Rs=40.4 Ohms, Xs=-5.4 Ohms) vs. in 2019: - SWR: 1:1.16 (Rs=43.2 Ohms, Xs=-1.6 Ohms)" If I can get those matches on a *transmitting* antenna, I am
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00037.html (8,051 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 14:52:11 +0100
Hi All, Yes, I refer to this 2-wire design: http://ha3ln.hu/2wire.jpg 73! Csaba Csaba also refers to this transformer as T2 and based on what he has said so far I suspect he is constructing something
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00040.html (15,149 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 15:44:42 +0100
Hi Lee, Thanks for the notes. Yes, the 1:1.16 measurement was from 2019 which I take as baseline. My aim was to have similar transformers for the new 2-wire directions but somehow I cannot wind them
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00041.html (17,953 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 15:45:16 +0100
...no problem Lee, actually each new idea helps. I'll give a try the n1=4T version with a 0.3mm (~AWG 28/29) wire to see if I can push a bit better matching. Sorry for the links I tried to avoid send
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00042.html (21,354 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 15:51:56 +0100
...thanks Luke, then I stop gold plating... ;-) One of the new directions is pointing dedicated to VK/ZL hope I can catch you in the CQ160m. 73! Csaba If I can get those matches on a *transmitting* a
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00043.html (9,015 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 14:38:52 -0800
I question the wisdom of grounding the feedline shields at the antenna for either open wire or coax designs. Was this a error in the schematic? The bidirectional design using a coaxial cable shield f
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00056.html (18,814 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu