Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+ADC\s+Overload\s+from\s+MW\s+transmitters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Re: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:07:48 -0700
Not having any particular axe to grind, I'll pile on a bit with some comments. 1. The superhet/SDR vs direct sampling radio manufacturer and technology competition is and will continue to be very goo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00136.html (14,700 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Re: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:01:01 +1000
This is not true- higher sample rates are just as effective in reducing overload as higher bit resolution. The higher sample rates reduces the probability of multiple signals happening at the same ti
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00138.html (9,115 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Re: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Hicks, N5AC" <steve@flexradio.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:02:55 -0500
Agreed. Simply my opinion here, but in my experience booth analog and digital can yield results that will please even the most discerning audiophile. Generally, the things that go wrong are design er
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00167.html (16,907 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Re: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:49:13 -0700
In the world of pro audio (those who make a living doing it) we say "audiophool," alternate spelling "audiofool." Generally, the things that go wrong are design errors that result in distortion. Or a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00168.html (11,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu