Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+Twin\s+Lead\s+Marconi\s+Antenna\]\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+Twin\s+Lead\s+Marconi\s+Antenna\]\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: [Fwd: Re: Twin Lead Marconi Antenna]] (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@surfvi.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:08:21 -0400; reduced by a 4 to 1 base impedance multiplication factor has been disputed. There also is a significant benefit to increase B/W with shortened towers where in AM applications the B/W is so narrow th; /archives//html/Topband/2009-06/msg00064.html (8,763 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Twin Lead Marconi Antenna]] (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:30:50 -0400; All of the credit for debunking the myth goes to Tom, W8JI. I have only referred people to Tom's work. On the other hand, since the folded monopole does provide an easier way of feeding and matching; /archives//html/Topband/2009-06/msg00065.html (7,547 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Twin Lead Marconi Antenna]] (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:40:00 -0400; As a long-time user of the "folded umbrella" on 160, I am very grateful to the late John Haerle, WB5IIR, who brought the antenna to my attention in his article in Ham Radio Magazine and in his little; /archives//html/Topband/2009-06/msg00066.html (8,726 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]