Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1\/2\s+wl\s+verticals\s+and\s+spaving\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1\/2\s+wl\s+verticals\s+and\s+spaving\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 1/2 wl verticals and spaving (score: 1): Author: Carl Braun <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:23:16 +0000; Topbanders Im currently using a two element vertical array that I'm able to use on both 80 and 160M by switching in two different feedlines and matching schemes. The system works well using a Comtek; /archives//html/Topband/2015-11/msg00178.html (7,521 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 1/2 wl verticals and spaving (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:01:32 -0800; Any suggestions or websites available on ½ wl spacing and ½ wl radiators? Carl AG6X I did some modeling of this a long time ago. Basically, the issue is that if you feed the 1/2 wave verticals at th; /archives//html/Topband/2015-11/msg00179.html (7,741 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 1/2 wl verticals and spaving (score: 1): Author: Carl Braun <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:41:17 +0000; Rick Thanks for the reply. I'm glad to hear that it's that simple. I used the same principle when the verticals were dedicated to 40M and were 1/4wl tall where I fed them with 3/4wl and 5/4wl coaxial; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00000.html (8,250 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 1/2 wl verticals and spaving (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 08:30:39 -0500; I'm glad to hear that it's that simple. I used the same principle when the verticals were dedicated to 40M and were 1/4wl tall where I fed them with 3/4wl and 5/4wl coaxial runs. The gain and side nu; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00002.html (9,076 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]