Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1\.810\s+BCB\s+interference\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <flood@ixi.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:19:13 -0700
Throughout the winter so far, I've detected a carrier on 1.810 in the mornings before sunrise. The past two mornings, I could hear some modulation - some sports talk - but could not pick up the stati
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00053.html (6,623 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:56:00 -0800
The carrier is just audible here at 8:50 am local time near San Diego, just above my abysmally high S7 noise floor (in the 250 Hz filter). It was much stronger on Saturday night during the Stew, maki
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00055.html (7,748 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: ws6x@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:36:41 +0000
The carrier is just audible here at 8:50 am local time near San Diego, just above my abysmally high S7 noise floor (in the 250 Hz filter). It was much stronger on Saturday night during the Stew, maki
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00069.html (8,943 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:29:08 -0800
Has anyone sent this one to Riley? Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00072.html (7,301 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <flood@ixi.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:11:17 -0700
My post earlier today apparently didn't get through. I figured we'd better have the station positiviely identified first. Again this morning, I was not able to dicern a station i.d.. But with some t
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00075.html (7,393 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:01:59 -0500
ID'ing the station is absolutely necessary if you don't want to wait months. If you get a positive ID and if the station doesn't respond to a call I can pass it directly to the Field Office. After a
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00076.html (7,996 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: ws6x@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:05 +0000
I don't know what the other W6 / W7stations are hearing on 1810, but for us in the Fresno area the audio is without a doubt, KXEX. This is always the prominant audio (sometimes the only audio). You c
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00091.html (9,522 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: Peter Koehler <KJ7WY@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:08:43 -0700
I'll confirm that the offender heard on 1810 is KXEX 1550 Fresno as I heard their ID at 1300z this morning. Funny, when I go to 1550 can't hear their signal, other BCB stations. 73 Pete KJ7WY Flagsta
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00110.html (7,479 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:57:40 -0500
If they are being heard in Flagstaff that is way too loud. Any spurious signal that causes harmful interference is technically illegal regardless of the local power level at the source, so you shoul
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00112.html (8,696 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "flood@ixi.net" <flood@ixi.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:02:03 -0700
Same here Pete... Not much for other signals on the band this morning, so listened to 1.810 carrier and could get a definite SW direction. Shortly thereafter, the modulation came up and I caught the
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00113.html (8,333 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:23:09 -0800
their ID at 1300z this morning. Funny, when I >go to 1550 can't hear their signal, other BCB stations. == Peter, I would like you to do one more check. The next time you are copying the KXEX program
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00115.html (8,361 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:09:46 -0500
That won't work!! It isn't necessary!! The IM product you hear: 1.) Is on a clear frequency. 2.) Is on a higher frequency where propagation is better. 3.) Is NOT being broadcast with the same antenn
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00116.html (9,080 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:46:57 -1000
Being new to top band from this area, but interested in the 1810 signal I also have a signal on 1810, figured I was way to distant for it to be the same signal as the CA guys are hearing, but perhap
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00119.html (9,089 bytes)

14. Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:09:46 -0800
I just copied 1550 News Radio Fresno here in Oregon only on 1810. I stuck the spectrum analyzer on the antenna and it is 40db out of the noise in 100hz bandwidth. Weirdest signal I have ever seen. It
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00136.html (8,194 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: Peter Koehler <KJ7WY@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:55:50 -0700
Hey Guys: 73 Pete KJ7WY _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00170.html (8,562 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu