- 1. Topband: 1.99? (score: 1)
- Author: W7lr@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:54:56 EDT
- This morning, Ross 9M2AX and I and others, did some experimenting on 80 and 160, with differences between the two bands like night and day, as we would expect. He was a real 599 on 80 on the 90' tx v
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00084.html (7,697 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: 1.99? (score: 1)
- Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:11:51 -0700
- Sure a 1.99 MHz QSO would count for 160. I have often wondered what the propagation would be like up there. I once did a quick QSY with some DX station (I forget who it was) to try it - but more expe
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00085.html (6,836 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: 1.99? (score: 1)
- Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:35:44 -0400
- I can throw my hat in the ring too if you need a little guy. I doubt I'm going to be able to work Ross just by QSYing to 1.990MHz but I'm set up with a vacuum variable cap such that I can QSY up the
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00086.html (6,647 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: 1.99? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Eldridge" <eldridge@direct.ca>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:02:23 -0700
- I remember there were such tests many years ago (around 1980 maybe?) and there did not appear to be any advantage in the higher frequency. At the time NM7M expressed the opinion that 2.0 MHz being f
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00088.html (7,894 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: 1.99? (score: 1)
- Author: tsmithers@cix.co.uk (Trevor Smithers)
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:04 +0100 (BST)
- Just a thought but wondered if K1JT's WSPR (Whisper) Weak Signal Propagation Reporter tool might be of use - see here http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wspr.html Setup tutorial here http://www
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00090.html (7,326 bytes)
- 6. Re: Topband: 1.99? (score: 1)
- Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:39:15 -0400
- Here's another "little guy" who would be interested in giving the high end of the band a try. I spend all of my time at 1.835 and down...maybe I'm missing some possibilities higher in the band. I can
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00097.html (7,902 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: 1.99? (score: 1)
- Author: Nagi <nagi@nmt.ne.jp>
- Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 20:17:19 +0900
- I remembered something about 70's when I read Bob W7LR's post "1.99?" and the response"Re:1.99?" So I went over my 160M log in 70's. In those days the stations in Pacific like KH6 appeared 1990-1999K
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00018.html (8,901 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu