Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1\.99\s+and\s+beacons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1\.99\s+and\s+beacons\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 1.99 and beacons (score: 1): Author: W7lr@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:22:22 EDT; I let the cat out of the bag regarding 1.99, but dont know how to get him back in. I didn't know how to pursue this, but am glad that Tree picked up the ball with his two beacons. It is not easy to o; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00021.html (8,196 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 1.99 and beacons (score: 1): Author: GEORGE WALLNER <gwallner@the-beach.net>; Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 09:00:29 -0400; My QTH is at EL95. It is probably the most distant CONUS low band station from Tree's QTH. Almost a DX. Both theory and intuition suggest that 1.99 MHz should be better for long distance communicatio; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00023.html (7,465 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 1.99 and beacons (score: 1): Author: KG6DV@cs.com; Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:42:17 EDT; At 1130 UTC this morning the 1800.5 K7RAT beacon was an easy 100% copy at about 549. The 1999.5 beacon was detectable, however it was in and out of the noise, maybe a 20-25% copy. Both signals seemed; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00024.html (7,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]