Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\-Meter\s+Propagation\s+Mysteries\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\-Meter\s+Propagation\s+Mysteries\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160-Meter Propagation Mysteries (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:10:34 -0500; Good Day All, Last night was a stellar one in terms of workable DX on Top Band...! But what always absolutely & positively floors me each & every time, though, is how it's sometimes nearly impossible; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00045.html (7,291 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160-Meter Propagation Mysteries (score: 1): Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:28:21 +1300; Hi Eddy, There are one or two members of this group who will contest the idea of one way prop, but I am convinced that it does happen. Even with Rx noise levels and Tx power levels taken into accoun; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00051.html (7,248 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160-Meter Propagation Mysteries (score: 1): Author: Gedking@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:55:11 EST; Propagation depends on lots of variables. the number of hops, what the conditions are on the first hop from the xmiting station. The xmiting station can have a different number of hops than the recei; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00052.html (7,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]