- 1. TopBand: 160 m band plan (score: 1)
- Author: john.devoldere@village.uunet.be (John Devoldere (ON4UN))
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 15:14:03 +0000
- Dear Fellow Topbanders. We are currently negotiating with our licensing authoriteis to obtain more frequencies on top band. Some time ago sopmeone published a table with the frequencies used by the d
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00328.html (7,110 bytes)
- 2. Topband: 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
- Author: "W9RE" <w9re@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:50:46 -0500
- I?ve been more active on topband this season with a new receiving array (8 verticals designed by W8JI) and have been thinking about the CQWW SSB contest and the US band plan. A few years ago Jeff ?ZM
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00162.html (7,880 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
- Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:27:21 -0500
- Pretty much. This also happens during the NAQPs where there are a couple of hours of pretty intense SSB activity. During the CW contests (ARRL 160, Stew Perry and CQ 160), it is common to hear CW co
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00163.html (7,329 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:33:11 -0400
- refrain from the contest well. There were 42 and listening well. If the DX stations keep insisting on working simplex in contests on 160 and if USA stations do the same, everyone will severely limit
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00165.html (8,135 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
- Author: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:32:28 +0000
- During the CW contests (ARRL 160, Stew Perry and CQ 160), it is common to hear CW contacts way up in the SSB part of the band... There is no such thing as the "SSB part of the band." There is the "ph
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00166.html (7,125 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu