Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+Meter\s+Antenna\s+Help\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+Meter\s+Antenna\s+Help\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 Meter Antenna Help (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@hotmail.com (Thomas Giella, KN4LF); Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:52:31 -0400; On 160 meters, for dxing I use a T antenna with a 252 foot flat top (broadside NW-SE), a 75 foot vertical section, a second 55 foot section (linear load) and one #12 1/4 wave radial on the ground sur; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00049.html (10,104 bytes)
2. Topband: 160 Meter Antenna Help (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 06:05:43 -0400; "Capacitive coupling" is maximum near the voltage point of an antenna. Moving the voltage near earth and concentrating it around one single radial is generally not a good idea. Ground losses are a co; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00052.html (8,274 bytes)
3. Topband: 160 Meter Antenna Help (score: 1): Author: k3ky@erols.com (k3ky@erols.com); Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 15:03:37 -0400; These lowband transmitting antenna discussions sometimes give me a headache. Is it possible that two different (but related) subjects are being intermixed here? One seems to be antenna efficiency in; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00076.html (12,252 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]