Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+Propagation\s+\&\s+Weather\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+Propagation\s+\&\s+Weather\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1): Author: charlesh3@msn.com (Charles Hutton); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 21:55:37 -0800; I'd agree - Kazimrovsky's paper is what is called a literature survey in my neck of the engineering world. It's also a call for further research. No new data is presented and no conclusions are drawn; /archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00003.html (8,901 bytes)
2. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1): Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK); Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 07:28:33 -0800 (PST); Yes, of course it's a review paper; there's nothing wrong with that. Granted that a review paper is not the best reference to cite for observations of a specific phenomenon. In his defense Tom did sa; /archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00007.html (9,590 bytes)
3. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1): Author: charlesh3@msn.com (Charles Hutton); Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 07:00:27 -0500; Hi Mike: Of course there is nothing wrong with review papers. I read them all the time for quick education and catch-up, and I'm always in need of one or the other..... But the original subject that; /archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00014.html (7,429 bytes)
4. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1): Author: k1mk@alum.mit.edu (Michael Keane, K1MK); Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:46:11 -0500; Hi Chuck, I understood. This has become become a rather lengthy and convoluted thread. And I was attempting to comment on several of its disparate aspects, perhaps not as clearly as I might have. Chu; /archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00016.html (8,949 bytes)
5. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com (Thomas Giella, KN4LF); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:24:00 -0500; Thomas KN4LF Says: Joe Dube KK4TR of Brooksville, FL and I have conducted subjective observations of this effect via 160 and 120 meters and the MF broadcast band for the past 4 winters. Subjective ob; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00158.html (7,761 bytes)
6. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:00:17 -0500; I can't imagine anyone trying to measure such tiny changes without extensive ground systems and very accurate and stable FS meters on a ground wave path. Sky wave would be worse yet, especially with; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00160.html (7,626 bytes)
7. Topband: 160 Propagation & Weather (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:08:49 -0500; Kazimrovsky et al seems to be mainly a catalogue of questions that still need to be answered. The paper is available at http://eos.wdcb.ru/transl/gma/9503/pap01.htm There are a few additional resourc; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00165.html (8,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]