Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+Windom\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+Windom\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 Windom (score: 1): Author: "Ed Hughes" <kg4w@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:05:00 -0400; Does anyone have experience with a 160m Windom? I like the fact that it has a vertical radiating section. I can't put up an inverted L due to the location. If I did put one up I could only lay 1 radi; /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00074.html (7,383 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160 Windom (score: 1): Author: Art <k6xt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:36:51 -0600; Allan I too used a 160 Carolina Windom, height 55 feet. Mostly horizontal. I have no radials beneath it. For my first 3 years in Colorado it was my main antenna. Literally I 'worked the world' with i; /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00075.html (7,090 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]