Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+m\s+inverted\s+L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+m\s+inverted\s+L\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L (score: 1): Author: "David Cutter" <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 12:04:25 -0500; Hello Peter I haven't done any work on this, but Ralph has. Have a look at this site and others of his: http://www.arising.com.au/people/holland/ralph/shortvert.htm David G3UNA Think of a dipole clos; /archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00061.html (12,179 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 12:22:01 -0600; Got a lot of mail about this, teaching me to shut up because I don't have much free time. Look folks, as you all know, just about everything with antennas works in some fashion and there's a sliding; /archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00062.html (9,334 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:07:45 -0800; David, Thanks for sharing the study. I am trying to digest it. Need to go through it again. He says: " There is an optimal height for an elevated groundplane, that height is not at ground zero, and i; /archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00063.html (13,518 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]