Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+meter\s+vertical\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: k4kyv@hotmail.com (Donald Chester)
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:23:14 +0000
Or tune the tower to 1:1 @ 1900 kc/s with a simple L network at the base of the tower. Mine stays within less than 3:1 from 1800 to 2000. To move anywwhere in the band, the only tuning adjustment I
/archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00015.html (6,764 bytes)

2. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: k1my@msn.com (Bruce Makas)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 17:01:18 -0700
I'm sure that someone has used Rohn 25 as a 160 vertical either as stand alone or with a stinger. Is there any dimensional info available someplace? 73, Bruce K1MY
/archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00070.html (6,741 bytes)

3. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: k8do@amethyst.diamondcs.net (Dennis O'Connor)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:18:02 -0400
Depending on what part of the band you want and what metallic structures are nearby, either 12 or 13 sections - + - a top hat will resonate... I have 12 sections on a 6 foot base and it resonates in
/archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00075.html (7,948 bytes)

4. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:54:22 -0700
"I'm sure that someone has used Rohn 25 as a 160 vertical either as stand alone or with a stinger. Is there any dimensional info available someplace?" == Because shunt feeding is as efficient as seri
/archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00077.html (7,080 bytes)

5. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:27:35 +0100
Dear Topbanders, Dennis has a good solution written below with about 116.5 feet of tower plus the "X" for top loading. Some items to consider: 1. The X is copper, the Rohn tower sections are zinc gal
/archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00081.html (8,186 bytes)

6. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: k8do@amethyst.diamondcs.net (Dennis O'Connor)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:08:23 +0100
I can't argue with anything in your excellent treatise, George... RE, the corrosion potential: the copper top hat is now down, but it was on there for three winter DX seasons (~2.5 years)... The copp
/archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00084.html (7,786 bytes)

7. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: "bruce makas" <k1my@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:14:11 -0700
I recall some discussion either here or on TowerTalk about using R25 tower sections with an aluminum "stinger" on top as a 160 vertical but I cannot find the particulars. Several questions: How tall
/archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00129.html (6,697 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Milt Jensen" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:09:47 -0700
Bruce, Our 160 Meter antenna at XZ0A was 40' of Bangkok 25 (Rohn knock off), a short insulated section, then 100' of Bangkok 25. The top 30' to resonate the Ground Plane was made of three sleeved sec
/archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00131.html (8,366 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: "George & Marijke Guerin" <gmguerin@voyager.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:33:08 -0400
Bruce, et. al., Similar to Milt's reply, I recall someone using 11 straight sections of 25G, a tapered top section with sleeve, and about 12 feet of 1-1/2 or 2 inch galvanized pipe out the top. The t
/archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00132.html (9,022 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu