Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+skip\s+distance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+skip\s+distance\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: Larry <lmwatbullrun@runbox.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:36:45 +0000; 160 is absolutely capable of NVIS; I've tested it and 160 NVIS works on sideband with between 10 and 20 watts, or about 2.5 watts CW, so having a groundwave signal nulled by NVIS is possible. Larry W; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00075.html (10,525 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:07:25 -0700; Larry W8ANT You should be able to get rid of the NVIS wave by simply using a vertical as the receive antenna. I'm surprised no one mentioned this already. Rick N6RK _________________ Searchable Archi; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00076.html (7,037 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:14:49 -0500; A few years back guys on this forum decided to see what could be worked at noon time. There were a few stations on at that time and I worked stations up to 600 miles. That will vary with band conditi; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00077.html (6,989 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: Dan Edward Dba East edwards <dan.n.edwards@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:41:16 +0000 (UTC); true enough. i have heard K0RF at high noon, here in north east texas 73, w5xz On Tuesday, September 17, 2019, 08:14:58 AM CDT, K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net> wrote: A few years back guys on this forum; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00078.html (7,634 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:54:41 -0400; There's a "max distance in pure daylight" Stew Perry award at least some years? At start of a 160M contest (5PM local time, shortly before my sunset) I have no problem making QSO's into Indiana and I; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00079.html (8,670 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:06:44 -0700; There was indeed a plaque for the longest distance - within an hour of high noon. I believe it was a QSO between Oregon and Arizona - a pretty good distance. Tree _________________ Searchable Archive; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00080.html (9,535 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: Brian Campbell <VE3MGY@hotmail.ca>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:38:35 +0000; Hi Jerry and group, I was one of those stations Jerry. I worked you at 1712z and 1717z on 2008-01-05. I was running 100 watts and the distance was 1200km. We gave each other 549 reports IIRC ( from m; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00081.html (9,385 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: Brian Campbell <VE3MGY@hotmail.ca>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:40:50 +0000; Sorry, the second QSO was at 1726z not 1717z. ________________________________ From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Brian Campbell <VE3MGY@hotmail.ca> Sent: September 17, 2019; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00082.html (9,601 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: 160 skip distance (score: 1): Author: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:59:12 -0400; During both the ARRL 160 or the CQWW 160 CW contests from C6AGU (FL14tv, a very quiet location) about 250 miles east of FL, I hear and work stations during the day well into the continental US: somet; /archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00083.html (8,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]